|
Under the Kefauver-Harris Drug
Amendments of 1962 (amending the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938), a drug
is considered to be effective that has been designated as such by the Food and
Drug Administration on the basis of "substantial evidence." Such evidence was
defined by Congress as "... adequate and well-controlled investigations,
including clinical investigations, by experts qualified by scientific training
and experience to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug involved."
Equally potent, or equally capable of
producing a pharmacologic effect of a specified intensity. The masses of the
drugs required to produce this degree of effect may be compared, quantitatively,
to yield estimates of "potency" of the drugs. Obviously, if two drugs are not
both capable of producing an effect of a given intensity, they cannot be
compared with respect to potency; i.e., drugs with different intrinsic
activities or ceiling effects cannot be compared with respect to potency in
doses close to those producing the ceiling effect of the drug with the greater
intrinsic activity.
In 1969, a federal Task Force on
Prescription Drugs recommended that the words "generic equivalents" no longer be
used in describing and comparing drug preparations. The Task Force recommended
that an appropriate nomenclature should take into account three kinds of
equivalence of drug preparations:
- Chemical Equivalents:
-
Those multiple-source drug products which contain essentially identical
amounts of the identical active ingredients, in identical dosage forms, and
which meet existing physicochemical standards in the official compendia.
- Biological Equivalents:
- Those chemical equivalents which, when administered in the same amounts,
will provide essentially the same biological or physiological availability, as
measured by blood levels, etc.
- Clinical Equivalents:
- Those chemical equivalents which, when administered in the same amounts,
will provide essentially the same therapeutic effect as measured by the
control of a symptom or a disease.
The fraction of C0
remaining at some specified time after drug administration; more generally, the
fraction of C, or AB, remaining after some
specified time interval. For first-order, single compartment systems (i.e. those
yielding a single straight line when log C is plotted against t), f can be
determined from the relationship: log C = log C0
- b t. When t is the time after drug administration, or the interval between two
administrations, and t1/2 is the elimination
half-life of the drug, f is 0.5 raised to a power which is the ratio of the time
interval to the elimination half-life, i.e., 0.5t/t1/2.
The fraction of a dose which is absorbed and
enters the systemic circulation following administration of a drug by any route
other than the intravenous route; the availability of drug to tissues of the
body, generally. When the total clearance and the dose of drug administered are
known, F can be determined from the relationship: (AUC x ClT)/D = F. When identical doses of a drug have been given by
the intravenous and by some other route (x), and the AUCs have been determined,
the availability of the drug after administration by route X can be determined:
F=AUCx/AUCiv.
The amount of free drug recovered in the urine (AU) after administration of identical doses given
intravenously and by route X can also be used to determine availability:
F=AU,x/AU,iv
According to the
law of mass action, the velocity of a chemical reaction is proportional to the
product of the active masses (concentrations) of the reactants. In a
monomolecular reaction, i.e., one in which only a single molecular species
reacts, the velocity of the reaction is proportional to the concentration of the
unreacted substance (C). The change in concentration (dC) over a time interval
(dT) is the velocity of the reaction (dC/dT) and is proportional to C. For
infinitely small changes of concentration over infinitely small periods of time,
the reaction velocity can be written in the form of a differential equation:
-dC/dt=kC. Here, dC/dt is the reaction velocity, C is concentration, and k is
the constant of proportionality, or monomolecular velocity constant, which
uniquely characterizes the reaction. The minus sign indicates that the velocity
decreases with the passage of time, as the concentration of unreacted substance
decreases; a plot of C against time would yield a curve of progressively
decreasing slope. The mechanisms, the kinetics, described by the differential equation are
termed first order kinetics because - although the exponent is not
written - concentration (C) is raised to only the first power (C1). The differential equation above may be integrated and rearranged to yield:
ln(C/C0)= k t, where ln indicates use of the
natural logarithm, to the base e; C0 is the concentration of
unreacted substance at the beginning of an observation period; t is the duration
of the observation period; and k is the familiar proportionality or velocity
constant. The units of k are independent of the units in which C is expressed;
indeed, since a logarithm is dimensionless, and t has the dimension of time, the
integrated equation balances, dimensionally, because k has the dimension of
reciprocal time, t-1. Notice that for observation periods of equal
length, the ratio C/C0 is always the same; after
equal intervals, the final concentration is a constant fraction of the starting
concentration, or, in equal time intervals, constant fractions of the starting
concentration are lost, even though absolute decreases in concentration become
progressively less as time passes and C becomes smaller and smaller.
Let t1/2 represent the length of time
required for C0 to be halved, so that C=0.5
C0. Then, substituting in the integrated
equation above, ln 0.5 = -kt1/2, or, since
-0.693 is the natural logarithm of 0.5: -0.693 = kt1/2. Multiplying both sides of the equation by -1 yields
0.693 = kt1/2 or 0.693/k = t1/2: the natural logarithm of 2 (0.693) divided by the
monomolecular velocity constant yields the time required for the concentration
to be halved, the "half-life" or "half-time" of the reaction.
Since ln (C/C0) may be rewritten (lnC -
lnC0), the integrated equation may be rewritten
and given the form of a linear equation: ln C = ln C0 -kt. The existence of a monomolecular reaction can be
established by plotting ln C, for unreacted material, against t and finding the
relationship to be linear; the slope of the line is the original proportionality
or velocity constant, and the intercept of the line with the ordinate is the
natural logarithm of the original concentration of unreacted material. Since
natural logarithms have a fixed relationship to common logarithms, i.e.,
logarithms to the base 10 (lnX =2.303 log X), one may write: 2.303 log C =2.303
log C - kt. When common logarithms of C are plotted against t, a first order
reaction yields a straight line with a slope of k/2.303, and an intercept which
is the common logarithm of C0.
When two molecular species react with each other (a bimolecular reaction),
but one of the substances is present in a concentration greatly in excess of the
concentration of the other and/or does not change in concentration during the
reaction, the velocity of the reaction at any time is really determined only by
the concentration of the other substance. Such a pseudo-monomolecular reaction,
because the velocity is determined by the concentration of only one of the two
reactants, still follows first order kinetics.
Following administration of a drug, it may be eliminated from the body only
after "reacting " with tissue components which are present in high
concentrations and which are not used up to any degree during the drug's stay in
the body. Such eliminative processes mimic pseudo-monomolecular reactions, and
the drug is eliminated from the body according to first order kinetics,. The
apparent velocity constant determined for such a process is called the
elimination rate constant, kel, and the elimination
half-life can be computed as 0.693/kel.
The biotransformation
and/or excretion of a drug by hepatic, including biliary, mechanisms following
absorption of the drug from the gastrointestinal tract, before drug gains access
to the systemic circulation.
Drug formulations of identical
composition with respect to the active ingredient, i.e., drugs that meet current
official standards of identity, purity, and quality of active ingredient. Drug
dosage forms considered as "generically equivalent" are more properly considered
as "chemically equivalent" in that they contain a designated quantity of drug
chemical in specified stable condition and meet pharmacopoeial requirements for
chemical and physical properties. Each of a number of preparations of a given drug entity may carry a different
"proprietary name" or "trademark"; such a name is registered with the U.S.
Patent Office and identifies the special brand of the drug with the firm owning
the name. All such preparations - identical with respect to content and
specification of active ingredient - may be looked upon as comprising a "genus";
they are generically equivalent and are generic drugs. It is well recognized that a number of factors other than quantity of drug
present in a dose can determine the ultimate therapeutic usefulness of the drug
preparation, and even the availability of drug to the site of action once the
preparation has been given. Drugs may be generically equivalent but not
therapeutically equivalent. Factors which affect therapeutic usefulness or
efficacy of drug preparations include appearance, taste, disintegration and
dissolution properties of the preparation, interaction of active materials with
other ingredients including binders and solvents, pH, particle size, age of
preparation, conditions of manufacture such as degree of tablet compression, and
the nature and amount of coating of enteric-coated tablets.
A condition characterized by a
psychological craving for the effects produced by the administration of a drug.
The Expert Committee on Addiction-Producing Drugs of the World Health
Organization defines habituation (1957) as: "...a condition resulting from the
repeated consumption of a drug. Its characteristics include: (1) a desire (but
not compulsion) to continue taking the drug for the sense of improved well-being
which it engenders; (2) little or no tendency to increase the dose; (3) some
degree of psychic dependence on the effect of drug; but absence of physical
dependence and hence of the abstinency syndrome; (4) detrimental effects, if
any, primarily on the individual.
The period of time required for the
concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced to exactly one-half of
a given concentration or amount. The given concentration or amount need not be
the maximum observed during the course of the experiment, or the concentration
or amount present at the beginning of an experiment, since the half-life is
completely independent of the concentration or amount chosen as the "starting
point". Half-lives can be computed and interpreted legitimately only when
concentration or amount varies with time according to the law appropriate to the
kinetics of a first order reaction: the common logarithm of the concentration or
amount is related linearly to time, e.g.:
log C=a+bt
where C is concentration at time t, a (in logarithmic units) is the intercept
of the line with the ordinate, and b (which has a negative sign) is the slope of
the line. The parameters of the equation can be estimated from the plot of
experimental values of log C and t. The half-life can be computed simply by
dividing the slope of the curve into 0.301, the difference between the logarithm
of a number (C) and the logarithm of number half as large (C/2); the symbol for
half-life is t1/2.
The half-life of a drug in plasma or serum is frequently taken as indicating
the persistence of the drug in its volume of distribution; this interpretation
may be incorrect unless the material can move freely and rapidly from one fluid
compartment of the body to another, and is not bound or stored in one or another
tissue. The term "biological half-life" should not be used instead of the
specific terms "plasma half-life" or "serum half-life". The tissue for which the
half-life of a drug is determined should always be specified, e.g., "serum
half-life"; the half-life of a drug in muscle, kidney, etc., or in the whole
organism can be determined. Drug half-lives are frequently based on the results
of chemical analyses, i.e., the results of the reaction of a reagent with a
specific chemical group of a drug molecule; it should be remembered that
detection of the group per se does not necessarily imply its continuous
existence as part of a biologically active drug molecule.
A drug molecule that leaves the plasma may have any of several fates: it can
be destroyed in the blood; it can be eliminated from the body; or it can be
translocated to a body fluid compartment other than the intravascular to be
stored, biotransformed, or to exert its pharmacodynamic effects.
When the plot of log plasma or serum concentration (during the period of its
decline) against time is composed of two straight line segments, the inference
may be made that two first order processes are involved in the distribution and
biotransformation and elimination of the drug. The earlier phase - represented
by the line segment of greater slope - is termed the distributive phase, and
corresponds to the period during which translocation of the drug to its ultimate
volume of distribution occurs and is the dominant process; the later phase -
represented by the line of lesser slope - is termed the eliminative phase, and
corresponds to the period when biotransformation and elimination of drug are
dominant processes. For two-phase systems, three phase systems, etc., half-lives
of the drugs in the various phases can be determined only after more
sophisticated analysis of the data than that described above.
A federal law passed in 1916 which
regulated the manufacture, importation, transportation, and distribution
(wholesale, retail, dispensing) of all "narcotics" defined by the act. Coca
leaves and derivatives, opium and derivatives, and various synthetic agents were
subject to the act and are officially designated as "narcotics". The effect of
the law was to regulate possession and use of the materials designated as
narcotics. Since regulation was achieved through taxation, the law was enforced
by the Treasury Department, Bureau of Internal Revenue. Traffic in marihuana was
first controlled by the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937. More recently, additional materials, e.g., barbiturates, amphetamines, etc.,
were recognized by Congress as requiring legal control, and were included with
narcotics and marihuana in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. The law is
implemented by placing a nominal tax on certain materials under the law, and by
requiring that physicians, dentists, etc., be specially licensed, annually, to
legally prescribe materials covered by the law. The Act of 1970 is enforced by
the Drug Enforcement Administration of the U.S. Department of Justice.
The potential for causing harm; that which is
a potential cause of harm. With respect to chemicals which are capable of
causing harm, "hazard" is about equivalent in meaning to "toxicity"; measuring
the hazard or toxicity of a chemical is to measure its potency in producing
harm: the lower the dose required to produce harm, the greater the hazard or
toxicity, the more hazardous or toxic is the substance.
Since the time of Paracelsus, in the early 16th century, it has been
recognized that all chemicals, given in sufficient doses, are capable of
producing harm. Therefore, it is not very meaningful simply to call a chemical a
hazard, or to speak of a chemical as hazardous, without qualification or
definition. Three categories of information are needed to define a hazard:
specific descriptions of the harms it can produce, specific identification of
the species or kinds of subjects that can be harmed, and specification of the
kinds of exposure to the chemical (including dose) which can result in the
respective harms.
Observe that hazard is the potential for causing harm. However
hazardous a chemical might be, it may present no risk if potential
victims are not exposed to it! Risk management is the effort to limit the
likelihood that the hazard of a chemical will be realized or manifested.
For chemicals, such as drugs, it is frequently more informative to consider
their hazards relative to their potential for producing benefit, rather than
relative to the hazards of other chemicals. An extremely potent therapeutic
agent may also be potent in producing harm, but it may be a useful drug because
of its large therapeutic index or standardized safety margin.
The physiological state
necessary for a subject's manifesting an allergic response or reaction; the
state is dependent on the administration of a haptene or allergen to a
susceptible individual, and the development of antibodies and immune mechanisms
capable of being activated by a subsequent administration of the haptene.
Hypersensitivity may exist but not be manifested until a second administration
of haptene occurs. The dose of haptene (or drug) required to produce the
allergic response may be smaller, larger, or the same size as the dose required
for the drug to produce its characteristic pharmacologic effects; hence
hypersensitivity is not the same as sensitivity and the two words should not be
used as synonyms. The nature of the response to haptene in a hypersensitive
subject is determined by the immune mechanisms and effector organs and is not,
in general, related to the nature of the haptene; the allergic response in the
hypersensitive subject is qualitatively different from the expected
pharmacodynamic response to the haptene or drug.
A drug which produces a state clinically
indentical to sleep by means of action in the central nervous system.
A
qualitatively abnormal or unusual response to a drug which is unique, or
virtually so, to the individual who manifests the response. "Idiosyncratic
Response" usually applies to a response which is not allergic in nature and
cannot be produced with regularity in a substantial number of subjects in the
population , and which is ordinarily not produced in a greater intensity in an
individual, or in a greater fraction of the population, by the expedient of
increase in the dose. In other words, were frequency or intensity of
idiosyncratic response used as a measure of effect in constructing a dose-effect
curve, a curve might indeed be constructed, but its slope would be found to be 0
(zero), indicating that effect was not significantly a function of dose. In
practice, the mechanism of production of an idiosyncratic response is unknown;
once the mechanism is known, the response can usually be classified in some
other way.
Infusion, as a means of
drug administration, involves an effectively continuous flow of a drug solution
into the blood stream over a relatively long period of time. (Intravascular injections are separate administrations of drug solutions, each over a
short period of time.) A major purpose of an infusion is to maintain a steady
blood or plasma concentration of drug over a long period of time, i.e. to
achieve and maintain Css.
The Css achieved during infusion of a drug is
directly proportional to the rate of drug administration (D/T, or k0), and inversely proportional to both the rate of
elimination (kel), and to the volume of body
throughout which the drug is distributed: Css
=D/TkelVd.
Since, kelVd equals total
clearance: Css = D/TClT, or Css =k0/ClT. The concentration
finally achieved varies directly with the infusion rate and indirectly with the
total clearance of the drug (always assuming first-order elimination and a
single compartment system).
For a drug given by infusion, and eliminated by first-order kinetics from a
one-compartment system, the rate at which Css is
achieved depends only on the half-life of the drug. In the absence of other
doses (such as a loading
dose [q.v.]) the plasma concentration at any time after beginning the
infusion (CT), expressed as a fraction of the
Css to be achieved, is given by (1 - f):
CT/Css =
1 - 0.5T/t1/2
After duration of infusion of one half-life, 50% of the final concentration
will have been achieved; after a duration of infusion of 4 half-lives, about 95%
of the final concentration will have been achieved.
The property of a drug
which determines the amount of biological effect produced per unit of
drug-receptor complex formed. Two agents combining with equivalent sets of
receptors may not produce equal degrees of effect even if both agents are given
in maximally effective doses; the agents differ in their intrinsic activities
and the one producing the greater maximum effect has the greater intrinsic
activity. Intrinsic activity is not the same as "potency" and may be completely
independent of it. Meperidine and morphine presumably combine with the same
receptors to produce analgesia, but regardless of dose, the maximum degree of
analgesia produced by morphine is greater than that produced by meperidine;
morphine has the greater intrinsic activity. Intrinsic activity - like affinity
- depends on the chemical natures of both the drug and the receptor, but
intrinsic activity and affinity apparently can vary independently with changes
in the drug molecule.
In analogy to the Lineweaver-Burk plot of the reciprocal of reaction velocity
of an enzymatically catalyzed reaction against the reciprocal of the substrate
concentration, one may plot the reciprocal of the magnitude of the drug-induced
biological effect against the reciprocal of the drug concentration . Under ideal
conditions, the slope of the resulting line is a measure of affinity and the
point of intersection of the line with the ordinate is a measure of intrinsic
activity.
|