|
|
Wet
etching is to use some liquid chemical that dissolves the layer
to be etched, but that does not react with everything else. |
| |
 |
Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn`t.
Hydrofluoric acid (HF), for example will dissolve SiO2,
but not Si - so there is an etching solution for etching SiO2
with extreme selectivity to Si. |
| |
 |
The other way around does not work: Whatever
dissolves Si, will always dissolve SiO2, too. At
best you may come up with an etchant that shows somewhat different etching
rates, i.e. some (poor) selectivity. |
| |
Anyway, the thing to remember is:
Chemical etchants, if existing, can provide extremely good selectivity and
thus meet our second request from above. |
| |
 |
How about the
first
request, anisotropy? Well, as you guessed: It is rotten, practically
non-existent. A chemical etchant always dissolves the material it is in
contact with, the forming of a contact hole would look like this: |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
There is a simple and painful
consequence: As soon as your feature size is about 2 µm or smaller,
forget chemical structure etching. |
| |
 |
make
the opening in the mask smaller, accounting for the increase in lateral
dimensions. |
| |
 |
Etching off whole
layers. Be it some sacrificial layer after it fulfilled its
purpose, the photo resist, or simply all the
CVD layers or thermal
oxides which are automatically deposited on the wafer backside, too - they
all must come off eventually and this is best done by wet chemistry. |
| |
 |
Etching
coarse
structures, e.g. the opening in some protective layers to the
large Al pads which are necessary for attaching a wire to the outside
world. |
| |
 |
Etching off unwanted
native oxide on all Si or poly-Si layers that were
exposed to air for more than about 10 min. |
| |
 |
All
cleaning steps
may be considered to be an extreme form of chemical etching. Etching off
about 1,8 nm of native oxide might be considered cleaning, and a
cleaning step where nothing is changed at the surface, simply has no effect. |